Do low risk women actually birth in their planned place of birth and does ethnicity influence women's choices of birthplace?
By Hunter, M, Pairman, S, Benn, C, Baddock, S, Davis, D, Herbison, P, Dixon, L, Wilson, D, Anderson, J
on Sunday, 01 May 2011 in New Zealand College of Midwives Journal - Volume: 44
Purpose: Midwives practising as lead maternity caregivers in New Zealand (NZ) provide continuity of care to women who choose to give birth in a variety of settings including home, primary maternity units, secondary and tertiary level hospitals. The purpose of this study was to compare how frequently the planned place of birth matched the actual place of birth for a cohort of low risk women in the care of midwives and to identify whether ethnicity influences women’s choices in relation to planned place of birth. Method: The Midwifery and Maternity Provider Organisation (MMPO) database was accessed with agreement from the NZ College of Midwives (NZCOM). Ethical approval was gained from the NZ Multi-region Ethics Committee. Data were obtained from the MMPO database from 2006-2007 for a total of 39,667 births. Data were reduced through exclusion criteria to establish the cohort of 16,453 low risk women (41.47% of total sample) according to planned birthplace. The Stata statistical package was used to analyse data for this cohort of low risk women. Results: Within the total cohort (n=16,453), 9.36% of women had a homebirth, 16.25% of women birthed in a primary maternity unit and 74.36% of women birthed in a secondary/ tertiary hospital. Five women (0.03%) birthed in an atypical small maternity unit with access to epidural analgesia. This facility was categorised as a ‘primary plus’ facility and is different from primary units and secondary/ tertiary hospitals. Of the women planning a homebirth, 82.68% (n =1,513) gave birth at home. Just over ninety percent (n= 2,594) of women planning to birth in a primary maternity unit gave birth in this setting and over 99% of women planning birth in secondary/tertiary hospitals (n = 12,066) gave birth there. Only 3.95% of multiparous women did not give birth in their planned birthplace as compared with 6.02% of primiparous women.
View Article